Neurological evidence linguistic processes precede perceptual simulation in conceptual processing
Share:


Max Louwerse and Sterling Hutchinson. Department of Psychology, Institute for Intelligent Systems, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA.
Abstract
There is increasing evidence from response time experiments that language statistics and perceptual simulations both play a role in conceptual processing. In an EEG experiment we compared neural activity in cortical regions commonly associated with linguistic processing and visual perceptual processing to determine to what extent symbolic and embodied accounts of cognition applied. Participants were asked to determine the semantic relationship of word pairs (e.g., sky – ground) or to determine their iconic relationship (i.e., if the presentation of the pair matched their expected physical relationship). A linguistic bias was found toward the semantic judgment task and a perceptual bias was found toward the iconicity judgment task. More importantly, conceptual processing involved activation in brain regions associated with both linguistic and perceptual processes. When comparing the relative activation of linguistic cortical regions with perceptual cortical regions, the effect sizes for linguistic cortical regions were larger than those for the perceptual cortical regions early in a trial with the reverse being true later in a trial. These results map upon findings from other experimental literature and provide further evidence that processing of concept words relies both on language statistics and on perceptual simulations, whereby linguistic processes precede perceptual simulation processes.Click here for the full report.
Max Louwerse and Sterling Hutchinson. Department of Psychology, Institute for Intelligent Systems, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA.
Abstract
There is increasing evidence from response time experiments that language statistics and perceptual simulations both play a role in conceptual processing. In an EEG experiment we compared neural activity in cortical regions commonly associated with linguistic processing and visual perceptual processing to determine to what extent symbolic and embodied accounts of cognition applied. Participants were asked to determine the semantic relationship of word pairs (e.g., sky – ground) or to determine their iconic relationship (i.e., if the presentation of the pair matched their expected physical relationship). A linguistic bias was found toward the semantic judgment task and a perceptual bias was found toward the iconicity judgment task. More importantly, conceptual processing involved activation in brain regions associated with both linguistic and perceptual processes. When comparing the relative activation of linguistic cortical regions with perceptual cortical regions, the effect sizes for linguistic cortical regions were larger than those for the perceptual cortical regions early in a trial with the reverse being true later in a trial. These results map upon findings from other experimental literature and provide further evidence that processing of concept words relies both on language statistics and on perceptual simulations, whereby linguistic processes precede perceptual simulation processes.Click here for the full report.
Max Louwerse and Sterling Hutchinson. Department of Psychology, Institute for Intelligent Systems, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA.
Abstract
There is increasing evidence from response time experiments that language statistics and perceptual simulations both play a role in conceptual processing. In an EEG experiment we compared neural activity in cortical regions commonly associated with linguistic processing and visual perceptual processing to determine to what extent symbolic and embodied accounts of cognition applied. Participants were asked to determine the semantic relationship of word pairs (e.g., sky – ground) or to determine their iconic relationship (i.e., if the presentation of the pair matched their expected physical relationship). A linguistic bias was found toward the semantic judgment task and a perceptual bias was found toward the iconicity judgment task. More importantly, conceptual processing involved activation in brain regions associated with both linguistic and perceptual processes. When comparing the relative activation of linguistic cortical regions with perceptual cortical regions, the effect sizes for linguistic cortical regions were larger than those for the perceptual cortical regions early in a trial with the reverse being true later in a trial. These results map upon findings from other experimental literature and provide further evidence that processing of concept words relies both on language statistics and on perceptual simulations, whereby linguistic processes precede perceptual simulation processes.Click here for the full report.
Solutions
Support
Company

© 2026 EMOTIV, All rights reserved.

Your Privacy Choices (Cookie Settings)
*Disclaimer – EMOTIV products are intended to be used for research applications and personal use only. Our products are not sold as Medical Devices as defined in EU directive 93/42/EEC. Our products are not designed or intended to be used for diagnosis or treatment of disease.
Note on Translations: Non-English versions of this website has been translated for your convenience using artificial intelligence. While we strive for accuracy, automated translations may contain errors or nuances that differ from the original text. For the most accurate information, please refer to the English version of this site.
Solutions
Support
Company

© 2026 EMOTIV, All rights reserved.

Your Privacy Choices (Cookie Settings)
*Disclaimer – EMOTIV products are intended to be used for research applications and personal use only. Our products are not sold as Medical Devices as defined in EU directive 93/42/EEC. Our products are not designed or intended to be used for diagnosis or treatment of disease.
Note on Translations: Non-English versions of this website has been translated for your convenience using artificial intelligence. While we strive for accuracy, automated translations may contain errors or nuances that differ from the original text. For the most accurate information, please refer to the English version of this site.
Solutions
Support
Company

© 2026 EMOTIV, All rights reserved.

Your Privacy Choices (Cookie Settings)
*Disclaimer – EMOTIV products are intended to be used for research applications and personal use only. Our products are not sold as Medical Devices as defined in EU directive 93/42/EEC. Our products are not designed or intended to be used for diagnosis or treatment of disease.
Note on Translations: Non-English versions of this website has been translated for your convenience using artificial intelligence. While we strive for accuracy, automated translations may contain errors or nuances that differ from the original text. For the most accurate information, please refer to the English version of this site.