NeuroKey Demo


NeuroKey Demo
NeuroKey Demo NeuroKey Demo NeuroKey Demo
Classification: GA
Version: 1.1.0 Build 42

NeuroKey is a Windows compatible application that enables the wearer of an Emotiv EEG Headset to emulate a PC keyboard using head and facial movements, as well as pure thoughts.


While there may be many uses for NeuroKey, our primary objective was to produce an application which would open up the world of computing (and the Internet) to individuals whose physical abilities currently prevent them from doing so.


There are a number of products that offer limited computer use via an assortment of switch inputs. With NeuroKey, it is now possible to achieve the same results with nothing more than your thoughts, and the Emotiv headset.


NeuroKey supports the entire range of Emotiv headset detections, enabling it to be configured to the individual's ability. This includes eye movement, blinks, head movement and facial expressions as well as thirteen cognitive thoughts such as "Push", "Pull", "Lift" etc.


The virtual keyboard includes several special purpose keys designed to increase productivity. These include ".com" and ".net" for entering email or web address. There are also additional navigation and editing keys to simplify editing by providing single key-press "Word Left", "Word Right" and "Word Select" functionality.


The demo illustrates composing an email message, however with the full product you will be able to control any Windows application that can be use with a keyboard. We are currently implementing 'smart-app' keys which will provide unique functionality depending on the current application you are running. For example, when you are composing email, the virtual keyboard will have "Send", "CC" and ""BCC" keys. When browsing the Internet, those keys would take on a different functionality.


Compatible with the Emotiv EPOC consumer headset and SDK developer and research headsets.


Reviews 1 - 5 of 10
First | Prev. | 1 2 | Next | Last

Reviews
gmac, 06/10/2010 00:21:48
All data gratefully received!
Tom Espo, 06/09/2010 19:09:40
Quote
gmac wrote:
It's a bit of both. Theoretically the equipment can detect thousands of distinct states, but there's no way anyone could reliably project anything like that many. Very few people can get specific spectral control or characteristic wave patterns over particular brain regions, let alone specific sensor locations. We have to work with what's possible, and also smersh out the boundaries between states because humans are justt too indistinct, and instruments have to deal with extraneous noise sources that reduce sensitivity,


Would I be of any use to your research? Using my mind I found I can move parts of myself that not many others can. I can also feel sensations on my skin better by focusing. I plan to buy one of these headsets soon, is there any EEG stream or something I can send for you to see if I would be useful for testing other things?
Jeffrey Jacobsen, 04/17/2010 03:58:47
If it saves me from carpal tunnel then I say kudos! I'm certainly interested in the device. However, I feel like I'm about to pay for a ticket to a concert that's about to become a free show due to the exponential curve of technology now-a-days. If I'm not strapped for cash next month you can count me in for a purchase. Since I'm laid off and the economy isn't as good as the media would have the general public believe... the manufacturers of this amazing device will have to keep their fingers crossed with me, though.
gmac, 03/23/2010 23:17:23
It's a bit of both. Theoretically the equipment can detect thousands of distinct states, but there's no way anyone could reliably project anything like that many. Very few people can get specific spectral control or characteristic wave patterns over particular brain regions, let alone specific sensor locations. We have to work with what's possible, and also smersh out the boundaries between states because humans are justt too indistinct, and instruments have to deal with extraneous noise sources that reduce sensitivity,
Jeremy Azevedo, 03/23/2010 16:32:38
Quote
gmac wrote:
Humans (and non-implanted neural reading equipment) are just not accurate enough to see more than a few dozen options any time in the next few years!


Thanks for the reply. Forgive my ignorance on the subject, but is it a matter of what the equipment is able to detect or what the wearer is able to project neurally? If the wearer was able to control their thoughts more precisely (think meditation), would this concept be more attainable?
Reviews 1 - 5 of 10
First | Prev. | 1 2 | Next | Last